Land Imprinting Methods (page 4)
Prepared for Discovery Park, Safford, Arizona,
by Ted St. John, Ph.D.
Other
designs:
Most
of
the
people
who
have
built
their
own
imprinters
have
introduced
variations
on
the
basic
design,
either
to
reduce
construction
costs
or
to
add
what
the
builders
considered
to
be
improvements.
In
most
cases
these
have
not
worked
out
well.
Examples
include
a
roller
so
small
that
it
slides
rather
than
rolls
when
the
ground
is
wet,
a
unique
tooth
design
that
leaves
more
flat
ground
than
imprinted
area,
and
a
frame
of
light
design
that
cannot
accommodate
enough
weight
to
properly
imprint
hard
soils.
Other
"improvements"
have
included
low-cost
bearings
on
the
roller
that
resulted
in
immediate
breakage,
and
a
drive
mechanism
for
a
seed
bin
agitator
that
was
so
complex
that
the
operator
spent
more
time
repairing
than
using
it.
Most
of
the
mistakes
have
resulted
from
a
misunderstanding
of
the
reasons
for
the
original
design,
or
a
lack
of
experience
in
field
operation
with
the
stock
version.
In
general,
it
is
better
to
reserve
modifications
to
the
imprinter's
design
until
after
one
has
accumulated
some
experience
with
the
basic model.
Dr.
Bob
Dixon
has
continually
improved
the
imprinter
over
the
years,
and
the
most
recent
models
bear
only
limited
resemblance
to
the
earliest
versions.
A
recent
variation
includes
a
design
that
clamps
onto
the
blade
of
a
bulldozer,
with
the
weight
provided
by
the
tractor's
hydraulic
system
rather
than
ballast.
This
version
can
climb
steep
slopes,
limited
only
by
the
angle
at
which
the
bulldozer
can
apply
downward
pressure
to
the
roller.
It
can
also
be
clamped
on
a
rear
toolbar,
again
with
the
weight
provided
by
the
tractor's
hydraulics.
This
style
is
lighter
than
the
tow
style,
and
thus
less
expensive
to
build
and
easier
to
transport.
However
it
does
not
perform
as
well
on rough ground where the independent swiveling of the tow model is an advantage.
Use of the Land Imprinter
The
imprinter
is
adjusted
for
conditions
at
each
project,
with
the
loading
of
the
ballast
tanks
the
primary
adjustment.
Most
soil
conditions
may
be
met
by
loading
the
machine
to
a
total
weight
between
500
and
1000
lb
per
foot
of
roller
length.
The
exceptions
are
very
heavy
clay
soils,
which
may
be
too
hard
to
imprint
when
dry,
and
very sandy soils, which do not hold the imprint shape very well.
The
desired
imprints
have
smooth
walls
with
the
seeds
firmly
pressed
into
the
soil.
The
soil
surface
is
occupied
fully
by
depressions,
ridges,
and
walls
between
the
imprints.
The
bottoms
of
the
depressions
and
the
tops
of
the
ridges
are
sharp
rather
than
rounded.
If
the
soil
is
left
with
a
rolling
series
of
indistinct
depressions,
with
the
walls
consisting
of
loose
clods
rather
than
smooth
soil,
the
soil
was
too
hard
or
the
imprinter was not weighted properly.
The
smooth,
well-firmed
walls
of
a
good
imprint
leave
the
seeds
firmed
into
the
soil
so
that
capillarity
can
re-wet
the
seeds
from
the
moisture
that
collects
at
the
base
of
each
impression.
Enhanced
capillary
re-wetting
accounts
for
much
of
the
advantage
of imprinting over other seeding methods.
If
the
soil
is
too
hard
for
good
imprints,
it
needs
moisture
or
mechanical
ripping.
About
one
half
inch
of
rain
prepares
most
soils
for
imprinting.
One
half
inch
of
water
moistens
a
sand
to
about
a
foot
and
a
clay
to
three
or
four
inches,
usually
enough
for
good
imprints.
Sandy
soil
may
be
imprinted
immediately
after
a
rain,
but
clay
soil
should be allowed to dry a few hours so it will not stick to the roller.
Ripping
is
the
method
of
last
resort
because
it
damages
whatever
structure
the
soil
may
have.
Ripping
shanks
may
be
spaced
twelve
to
eighteen
inches
apart,
depending
upon
the
configuration
of
the
tool
bar.
Wide
spacing
is
usually
satisfactory
in
hard
soils,
which
tend
to
break
apart
between
the
ripping
shanks.
Disking
and
tilling are even more harmful to soil structure than ripping, and should be avoided.
The
imprinter
can
make
organic
debris
and
even
living
plants
into
beneficial
mulch,
but
a
large
accumulation
of
weeds
or
brush
can
prevent
successful
imprinting.
Brittle
woody
material
is
less
troublesome
than
tough,
ropy
weeds.
Large
imprinting
teeth
(8x8"),
or
those
with
a
sharp
angle,
work
best
in
heavy
vegetation.
Shrubs
and
perennial
grasses
usually
recover
well
after
imprinting,
allowing
the
use
of
imprinting
to improve partially degraded native vegetation.
During
imprinting
the
soil
must
be
compacted
enough
to
assure
good
capillary
movement
of
moisture,
but
loose
enough
to
allow
root
growth.
It
is
important
not
to
load the imprinter any more heavily than necessary for the soil conditions.
The
plants
used
in
the
imprinting
seed
mix
represent
the
desired
flora,
but
must
also
include
species
that
have
important
roles
in
the
process
of
rehabilitating
the
land.
Roles
played
by
the
plant
species
include
soil
protection,
weed
suppression,
sheltering
of
more
vulnerable
plant
species,
and
building
the
network
of
mycorrhizal
fungi.
The
best
"weed
beaters"
are
generally
fast
growing
natives
that
are
good
mycorrhizal
hosts.
In
many
cases
these
are
short-lived
perennial
grasses
and
composites.
Most
of
these
plants
are
intermediate
in
succession
between
the
pioneer
and
the
late
successional
(climax)
species.
These
tend
to
be
good
at
building
the
network
of
mycorrhizal
fungi
in
the
soil,
which
protects
against
erosion,
suppresses
weeds,
and
lays
the
foundation
for
growth
of
the
final
suite
of
late
successional plant species.
The
late
successional
species
are
often
left
out
of
the
seed
mix.
Conditions
at
the
time
of
seed
application
are
rarely
suitable,
and
these
species
tend
to
require
pretreatment
of
seeds
for
good
germination.
They
will
often
find
their
way
to
the
site
in
later
years
when
the
original
vegetation
becomes
inviting
to
birds
and
mammals.
They may also be planted from containers when conditions become favorable.
Mid-
and
late-seral
species
are
also
included,
but
will
fail
without
the
protective
and
soil-building
actions
of
the
nurse
crops.
Late-successional
species
are
rarely
good
competitors
against
an
established
weed
population.
The
worse
the
potential
weed
problem, the "weedier" the seed mix species must be.
The
seeds
should
represent
a
diversity
of
suitable
plant
species,
since
higher
diversity
plant
communities
better
resist
destructive
forces,
and
are
better
habitat
for
most
kinds
of
wildlife.
On
large
land
areas
the
seeds
that
make
up
the
bulk
of
the
mix
should be relatively inexpensive, should germinate without elaborate
pre-treatment, and should stand up well to storage and mechanical handling.
There
is
no
hard
rule
for
determining
the
amount
of
seed
to
apply,
but
the
total
amount
often
lies
between
10
and
20
lb.
per
acre.
It
is
best
to
determine
from
the
seed
supplier
or
by
testing
the
number
of
seeds
per
pound,
the
fraction
of
seeds
that
will
germinate,
and
the
proportion
of
the
bulk
seed
mix
that
consists
of
seeds
rather
than
chaff
or
other
materials.
This
pure,
live
seed
(PLS)
count
is
used
to
determine
the
number,
rather
than
the
weight
of
seeds
per
acre.
For
land
imprinting,
about
250
PLS
per
square
yard
of
ground
surface,
all
species
combined,
gives
a
good
general
guideline.
Seed
for
use
in
the
imprinter
is
mixed
with
wheat
bran
to
prevent
sorting
by
size.
Bran
is
available
from
feed
dealers,
and
the
most
desirable
type
is
"red
flaky
wheat
bran".
The
mixing
ratio
with
seeds,
or
with
seeds
and
granular
mycorrhizal
inoculum,
is
usually
1:1
by
volume.
If
the
seed
is
"trashy,"
it
will
be
necessary
to
agitate
it
vigorously
to
thoroughly
mix
the
bran
and
the
seed.
Any
mycorrhizal
inoculum
should
be
added
after
hammer
mill
treatment,
although
it
can
withstand
gentler
forms
of
agitation.
If
the
soil
is
devoid
of
native
mycorrhizal
fungi,
as
would
be
the
case
on
eroded,
graded,
or
overgrazed
land,
the
project
must
be
inoculated
at
planting,
or
all
plant
species
must
be
non-hosts.
That
is,
the
seed
mix
must
be
limited
to
the
species
that
do
not
need
the
mycorrhizal
symbiosis.
The
most
widely
used
examples
are
members
of
the
genus
Atriplex.
A
few
other
species
can
survive
without
symbionts,
and these are generally recognizable as the weediest among the natives.
The
regular
pattern
of
depressions
left
by
the
land
imprinter
suggests
that
the
resulting
vegetation
will
resemble
an
orchard
more
than
a
wildland.
This
turns
out
not
to
be
the
case.
Plant
species
sort
themselves
by
their
requirements
for
such
spatially
diverse
factors
as
soil
chemistry,
depth,
or
texture,
position
on
the
slope,
and
local
moisture
conditions.
Within
three
to
five
years
the
great
majority
of
imprinting
sites
have
looked
very
much
like
natural
vegetation,
with
little
sign
of
the
original
rows,
and plant species forming local single species patches.
To email us, click on
logo to left